This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
Dublin: 4 °C Friday 15 November, 2019
Advertisement

Gogglebox's Scarlett Moffatt just dealt a serious burn to Katie Hopkins on Twitter

So predictable.

IT’S A WELL established fact at this stage of the game that Scarlett Moffatt is the most entertaining and beloved participant on Channel 4′s Gogglebox.

And, running in complete contrast to that popularity, is rent-an-awful-opinion Katie Hopkins.

Earlier today, following a story about Scarlett and her plans to lose weight, Hopkins tweeted this at the Gogglebox star

And this afternoon Scarlett got back to her with a serious takedown.

You see, she’d already predicted Hopkins’ attack in her recent autobiography Scarlett Says

In a section where she discusses Katie Hopkins and how utterly boring she is, Scarlett wrote:

The thing is, she reads all of her press, so I wouldn’t be surprised if she finds out about this and slags me off. I wonder what she’ll say. Probably something about my appearance cos she likes doing that, or maybe she’ll imply I’m thick. I’ll get in first. Yes, I know I look like an oompa loompa. I’m genuinely excited now to see what happens.

“always one step ahead of you, Hopkins”

tumblr_inline_o57hqa6nwF1simekw_500 Source: Tumblr

Needless to say, everyone’s chalking this one down as a win for Scarlett

scarlett2 Source: Twitter

Because Katie Hopkins is so predictable that her tactics are printed in books before they actually happen

Scarlet for you, Katie.

hat tip Buzzfeed

DailyEdge is on Snapchat! Tap the button below to add!

More Scarlett Moffatt is the genius of Gogglebox. Here’s why>

More The Full Irish Pizza at this Bray pizzeria will make you drool>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

David Elkin

Read next:

COMMENTS (3)